Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

v3.23.3
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Litigation Costs and Contingencies
 
From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Other than as set forth below, management is currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that could have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results.
 
In the normal course of business, the Company incurs costs to hire and retain external legal counsel to advise it on regulatory, litigation and other matters. The Company expenses these costs as the related services are received. If a loss is considered and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Company recognizes an expense for the estimated loss.
 
On October 7, 2022, one of our stockholders (the “2022 Plaintiff”), filed a shareholder derivative action against us, Michael Panosian, Joshua Keeler, Zareh Khachatoorian, Martin Galstyan, et. al. (collectively, the “2022 Defendants”) in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Case No. A-22-859580-B. In the complaint, the 2022 Plaintiff alleged a breach of the applicable 2022 Defendants’ fiduciary duties of loyalty, good faith, and due care owed to us and our shareholders, by negligently, willfully, recklessly and/or intentionally failing to perform their fiduciary duties primarily in connection with our registered direct offering of 2,500 shares of Series F preferred stock and 2,500 shares of Series G preferred stock in February 2022 and subsequent 1-for-150 reverse stock split effected in April 2022. The 2022 Plaintiff claimed that the 2022 Plaintiff has suffered (i) monetary damages in excess of $10,000, and (ii) attorney fees and costs, and is entitled to reimbursement. The 2022 Plaintiff asked for the following relief (i) issuance of a preliminary injunction enjoining us and the Board from continued of their fiduciary duties; (ii) damages incurred by the plaintiff; (iii) for an accounting of our books and records; (iv) equity relief; and (v) reimbursements of attorney and courts fees and other related costs. We believe that the claims put forth by the 2022 Plaintiff are without merit and we intend to vigorously defend oursel
ves
 and the officers named in the complaint.
 
On June 22, 2023, PCS Properties 2, LLC (the “Plaintiff”) filed a first amended complaint in the Superior Court, State of California, County of Orange, Central Justice Center (Case No. 30-2023-01326779-CU-UD-CJC) against the Company.  In the complaint, the Plaintiff is suing the Company for Breach of the Company’s lease agreement, dated December 10, 2021 (the “Lease”), for the real property located at 8687 Research Drive, Suites 100, 150, 250, Irvine, CA 92618 (collectively, the “Premises”).  In Plaintiff alleges that the Company owes the Plaintiff rent in the estimated sum of $124,800 for the Premises, representing due rent through May 31, 2023 and is suing the following damages: (i) the unpaid rent, (ii) the rent for the balance of the term of the Lease (June 1, 2023 to May 31, 2027) in the minimum sum of $2,374,278, less any sums that the Company proves could be reasonably avoided and  (iii) all other
amounts necessary to compensate
Plaintiff
for
all the detriment proximately caused by the
Company’s
failure
to perform its obligations under
the Lease
or which in the
ordinary course
of
things would be
likely to result therefrom, including but not limited to the
cost of
recovering possession of the
Premises, expenses of
reletting, including necessary renovation and alteration of
the
Premises, reasonable attorneys' fees, and that portion of
any leasing commission paid by Plaintiff
in connection with the Lease
applicable
to the unexpired term of the Lease, in an amount to be proved at trial or earlier hearing in this matter (iv) prejudgment interest at the maximum legal rate (v) reasonable attorney’s fees and court fees.  The Company is reviewing this matter with its real estate attorney and available legal options and strategies to resolve this matter with the Plaintiff. As of September 30, 2023, the range of loss is estimated to be between $250,000 and $500,000, and the Company has accrued $375,000 for any potential loss.